Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
How The U.S. Regime And Its Allies Enforce Their Smears And Their Other Lies
01-29-2020, 01:28 AM,
#1
How The U.S. Regime And Its Allies Enforce Their Smears And Their Other Lies
How The U.S. Regime And Its Allies Enforce Their Smears And Their Other Lies

<span property="schema:name" class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden">How The U.S. Regime And Its Allies Enforce Their Smears And Their Other Lies</span>

<div property="schema:text" class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p><a href="https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2020/01/27/how-us-regime-and-its-allies-enforce-their-smears-and-their-other-lies/"><em>Authored by Eric Zuesse via The Strategic Culture Foundation,</em></a></p>

<p><strong>Without enforced suppression of truth, there would be no way that the U.S. and its allied regimes could continue hiding the </strong><a href="http://archive.is/O6YDv"><strong>lies that were behind</strong> their invasions of Iraq in 2003</a>, and of <a href="https://theduran.com/how-the-u-s-regime-justifies-the-theft-of-syrias-oil/">Syria since 2012</a>, and their <a href="http://archive.is/O6YDv">coup against Ukraine in 2014</a>, and also of their takeovers and attempted takeovers of other countries that had refused to be bullied by the U.S. regime into complying with its obsessive anti-Russian demands — America’s <a href="http://archive.is/MWj49">subterranean continuation of the Cold War, even after Russia had quit the Cold War in 1991</a>.</p>

<p><a data-image-external-href="" data-image-href="/s3/files/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=ghXrOrz5" data-link-option="0" href="https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=ghXrOrz5"><picture><!--[if IE 9]><video style="display: none;"><![endif]--><source srcset="https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=H4Iohlvu 1x" media="all and (min-width: 1280px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset="https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=H4Iohlvu 1x" media="all and (min-width: 480px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset="https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=H4Iohlvu 1x, https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-...k=H4Iohlvu 2x" media="all and (min-width: 1024px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset="https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=H4Iohlvu 1x" media="all and (min-width: 768px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset="https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/styles/inline_image_mobile/public/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg?itok=ghXrOrz5 1x" type="image/jpeg"></source><!--[if IE 9]></video><![endif]--><img data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="e1515c4a-2d91-4928-8bec-66b518db94e5" data-responsive-image-style="inline_images" height="372" width="500" src="https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-20bd8d8fa069.storage.googleapis.com/s3fs-public/inline-images/2020-01-28_16-49-19.jpg" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" /></picture></a></p>

<p><strong>All of the lies are still being propounded by the U.S. regime and remain fully enforced by suppression of the truth about these matters. </strong></p>

<p>That’s being done in all news-media except a few of the <em>non</em>-mainstream ones.</p>

<p>So: <strong>this is about an actual Western <em>samizdat</em></strong> - the West’s equivalent to the former Soviet Union’s systematic, and equally pervasive, truth-suppression, to fool the public into thinking that the Government represents them, no matter how much it does not.</p>

<p><em>(The chief trick in this regard is to fool them into thinking that since there is more than one political party, one of them will be “good,” even though the fact may actually be that each of the parties represents simply a different faction of a psychopathically evil aristocracy. After all: each party lied and supported invading Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011, and Syria constantly; and no party acknowledges that the 2014 regime-change in Ukraine was a U.S. coup instead of a domestic Ukrainian democratic revolution. On such important matters, they all lie, and in basically the same ways. These lies are bipartisan, even though most of the other political lies are heavily partisan.)</em></p>

<p><strong>Right now, Julian Assange is <a href="http://theduran.com/that-we-live-under-a-dictatorship-is-now-unquestionable-the-assange-case/">rotting to death</a> inside Britain’s equivalent to the U.S. regime’s Guantanamo Bay prison, </strong>which is Belmarsh Prison, in London. As the <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-security-wikipedia/cia-fbi-computers-used-for-wikipedia-edits-idUSN1642896020070816">CIA-edited</a> and <a href="https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2018/05/the-philip-cross-affair/">written</a> Wikipedia’s article on Belmarsh Prison retrospectively admits, <a href="http://archive.is/XYmFK#selection-369.0-377.2">“Between 2001 and 2002, Belmarsh Prison was used to detain a number of people indefinitely without charge or trial under the provisions of the Part 4 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001, leading it to be called the ‘British version of Guantanamo Bay’.”</a> However, only because of the case of Julian Assange is it now publicly known that this characterization of that prison is — at least for him — <em>equally </em><a href="https://thesaker.is/that-we-live-under-a-dictatorship-is-now-unquestionable-the-assange-case/"><em>true today</em></a>. And Assange is, indeed, being held there “indefinitely without charge or trial,” even after his having previously been held in various other forms of confinement, ever since at least 12 April 2012, when — being then ‘temporarily’ under house-arrest in Norfolk England, while awaiting trial on a manufactured rape-charge against him which was reluctantly abandoned by the Government only when the alleged victim refused to testify against him — Assange broadcast an interview for RT, Russian Television, an interview of the head of Lebanon’s Hezbollah, Hassan Nasrallah. The U.S.-and-allied regimes’ billionaires-owned-and-controlled ‘news’-media condemned Assange for this interview, because it enabled whomever still had an open mind, amongst the Western public, to hear from one of those billionares’ destruction-targets (Nasrallah), and for Assange’s doing this on the TV-news network of the main country that America’s billionaires are especially trying to conquer, which is (and since <a href="http://archive.is/sKLQr#selection-861.0-861.12">26 July 1945</a> has consistently <em>been</em>) Russia. The great then-independent investigative journalist Glenn Greenwald headlined about that interview, at Salon on 18 April 2012,<strong><em> <a href="https://www.salon.com/2012/04/18/attacks_on_rt_and_assange_reveal_much_about_the_critics/">“Attacks on RT and Assange reveal much about the critics:</a> Those who pretend to engage in adversarial journalism will invariably hate those who actually do it.” </em></strong>How true that was, and unfortunately still is! And Assange himself is the best example of it. Greenwald wrote:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><em>Let’s examine the unstated premises at work here. <strong>There is apparently a rule that says it’s perfectly OK for a journalist to work for a media outlet owned and controlled by a weapons manufacturer</strong> (GE/NBC/MSNBC), or by the U.S. and British governments (BBC/Stars & Stripes/Voice of America), or by </em><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14163988"><em>Rupert Murdoch and Saudi Prince Al-Waleed Bin Talal</em></a><em> (Wall St. Journal/Fox News), or by a banking corporation with </em><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/05/04/politico_funding/singleton/"><em>long-standing ties to right-wing governments</em></a><em> (Politico), or by for-profit corporations whose profits depend upon staying in the good graces of the U.S. government (</em><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/10/journalism_13/"><em>Kaplan/The Washington Post</em></a><em>), or by loyalists to one of the two major political parties (National Review/TPM/countless others), <strong>but it’s an intrinsic violation of journalistic integrity to work for a media outlet owned by the Russian government.</strong> Where did that rule come from?</em></p>
</blockquote>

<p>But from ‘temporary’ house-arrest there, Assange was allowed asylum by Ecuador’s progressive President Rafael Correa on <a href="http://archive.is/ZFFdu">20 June 2012</a>, to stay in London’s Ecuadoran Embassy, so as not to be seized by the UK regime to be sent to prison and probable death-without-trial in the U.S. To Correa’s shock, it turned out that Correa’s successor, Vice President Lenin Moreno, was actually a U.S. agent, who promptly forced Assange out of the Embassy, into Belmarsh prison, to die there or else become extradited to die in a U.S. prison, also without trial.</p>

<p><strong>And, for what, then, is Assange being imprisoned, and perhaps murdered?</strong> He divulged government secrets that should never even have <em>been</em> secrets! He raised the blanket of lies, which covers over these actually dictatorial clandestine international operations. He exposed these evil imperialistic operations, which are hidden behind (and under) that blanket of imperialists’ lies. For this, he is being martyred — a martyr for democracy, where there is no actual democracy (but only those lies).</p>

<p><strong><em>Here is an example:</em></strong></p>

<p>On December 29th, I headlined <a href="https://thesaker.is/further-proof-u-s-uk-france-committed-war-crime-on-14-april-2018/">“Further Proof: U.S., UK, & France Committed War-Crime on 14 April 2018”</a> and reported highlights of the latest Wikileaks document-dumps regarding a U.S.-UK-French operation to cover-up (via their control over the OPCW) their having committed an international war-crime when they had fired 105 missiles against Syria on 14 April 2018, which was done <em>allegedly</em> to punish Syria for having perpetrated a gas-attack in Douma seven days before — except that there hadn’t been any such gas-attack, but the OPCW simply lied and said that there might have been one, and that the Syrian Government might have done it! That’s <strong>playing the public for suckers.</strong></p>

<p>Back on 3 November 2019, Fox News bannered <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox-news-poll-bipartisan-majorities-want-some-u-s-troops-to-stay-in-syria">“Fox News Poll: Bipartisan majorities want some U.S. troops to stay in Syria”</a> and reported that when citing ISIS as America’s enemy that must be defeated, 69% of U.S. respondents wanted U.S. troops to <em>stay</em> in Syria. But when did ISIS ever constitute a threat to U.S. national security? And under what international law is any U.S. soldier, who is inside Syria, anything other than an <em>invader</em> there? The answer, to both of these questions, is obviously “never” and “none.” But if you are an investor in Lockheed Martin, don’t you want Americans to be suckers about <em>both</em>? And, so, they <em>are</em>. People such as Julian Assange don’t want the public anywhere to be lied-to. Anyone who is in the propaganda-business — serving companies such as Lockheed Martin — wants the public to be suckers.</p>

<p><strong>This is the way the free market actually works. It works by lying, and in such a country the Government serves the people who have the money, and not the people who don’t.</strong> The people who don’t have the money are supposed to be lied-to. And, so, they are. But this is not democracy.</p>

<p><em><u><strong>Democracy, in fact, is impossible if the public are predominantly deceived. </strong></u></em></p>

<p>If the public are predominantly deceived, then the people who do the deceiving will be the dictators there. And if a country has dictators, then it’s no democracy. In a totally free market, only the people with the most money will have any freedom at all; everyone else will be merely their suckers, who are fooled by the professionals at doing that — lying.</p>

<p><em><u><strong>The super-rich enforce their smears, and their other lies, by hiring people to do this.</strong></u></em></p>

<p>When Barack Obama said that <a href="http://archive.is/R1Gbd#selection-555.0-555.62">“The United States is and remains the one indispensable nation”</a> - so that each <em>other</em> nation is “dispensable” - he was merely exemplifying the view that only the most powerful is indispensable, and that therefore everyone <em>else</em> is dispensable. Of course, this is the way that he, and Donald Trump, both have governed in the U.S. And <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2019/08/10/americas-voters-want-to-remain-deceived/">Americans overwhelmingly endorse this viewpoint</a>. They’re fooled by both parties, because both parties serve only their respective billionaires — and billionaires are above the law; they <em>are</em> the law, in America and its allied regimes. That’s the way it is.</p>

<p><strong>This is the American gospel, and it is called “capitalism.” </strong>Oddly, after Russia switched to capitalism in 1991, the American gospel switched instead to pure global conquest — <em>über</em>-imperialism — and the American public didn’t even blink. <strong>So: nowadays, capitalism has come to <em>mean</em> über-imperialism. That’s <em>today’s</em> American gospel.</strong> Adolf Hitler would be smiling, upon today’s Amerika.</p>

<p>And as far as whistleblowers — such as Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden, and Chelsea Manning, and other champions of honesty and of democracy — are concerned: Americans agree with the billionaires, who detest and destroy such whistleblowers. <strong>Champions of democracy are shunned here, where PR reigns and real journalism is almost non-existent.</strong></p>
</div>
<span rel="schema:author" class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden">
<a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/users/tyler-durden">Tyler Durden</a>
</span>
<span property="schema:dateCreated" content="2020-01-29T05:15:00+00:00" class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden">Wed, 01/29/2020 - 00:15</span>

<div class="field field--name-field-tags field--type-entity-reference field--label-above">
<div class="field__label">Tags</div>
<div class="field__items">
<div class="field__item"><a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/terms/politics" property="schema:about" hreflang="en">Politics</a></div>
</div>
</div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/7KCRRL3QYnU" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>


http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge...other-lies
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)