Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jill Stein Challenges Hillary To Debate After "Russian Asset" Smear
10-19-2019, 06:09 PM,
Jill Stein Challenges Hillary To Debate After "Russian Asset" Smear
Jill Stein Challenges Hillary To Debate After "Russian Asset" Smear

<span property="schema:name" class="field field--name-title field--type-string field--label-hidden">Jill Stein Challenges Hillary To Debate After "Russian Asset" Smear</span>

<div property="schema:text" class="clearfix text-formatted field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field__item"><p><a href=""><em>Authored by Eoin Higgins via,</em></a></p>

<p>Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on Friday made the baseless claim that Dr. Jill Stein, the Green Party's 2016 nominee for president, was a Russian agent—an allegation that was met with derision from Stein and an invitation to debate. </p>

<p><em><strong>"In light of the latest slanderous allegations from Hillary Clinton, I challenge her to a debate," </strong></em>tweeted Stein.</p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">In light of the latest slanderous allegations from <a href="">@HillaryClinton</a>, I challenge her to a debate. It's past time to give the American people the real debate they deserved in 2016, but were denied by the phony DNC/RNC-controlled Commission on Presidential Debates. <a href=""></a></p>
— Dr. Jill Stein? (@DrJillStein) <a href="">October 18, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="" charset="utf-8"></script><p><em><strong>"It's a shame HRC is peddling conspiracy theories to justify her failure instead of reflecting on real reasons Dems lost in 2016," </strong></em>Stein <a href="">added</a>.</p>

<p><a data-image-external-href="" data-image-href="/s3/files/inline-images/hillary_conspiracy_theory.jpg?itok=M7Qgpl4d" data-link-option="0" href=""><picture><!--[if IE 9]><video style="display: none;"><![endif]--><source srcset=" 1x" media="all and (min-width: 1280px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset=" 1x" media="all and (min-width: 480px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset=" 1x, https://zh-prod-1cc738ca-7d3b-4a72-b792-...k=Q1-bwr7M 2x" media="all and (min-width: 1024px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset=" 1x" media="all and (min-width: 768px)" type="image/jpeg"></source><source srcset=" 1x" type="image/jpeg"></source><!--[if IE 9]></video><![endif]--><img data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="96dfbc29-76bd-4e47-8e7f-8a55550bd922" data-responsive-image-style="inline_images" height="262" width="500" src="" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" /></picture></a></p>

<p>Clinton, who lost the 2016 presidential election to Donald Trump, made the comments in an interview with David Plouffe on his Campaign HQ podcast.</p>

<p><em><strong>"She's a Russian asset," </strong></em>said Clinton.</p>

<p><em><strong>"I mean, totally."</strong></em></p>

<p>The former secretary of state also claimed that Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), a hopeful for the Democratic nomination in 2020, was compromised by Russia. </p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">Hillary Clinton doesn't just predict the Russians will support Tulsi Gabbard as a third-party candidate; she also calls Jill Stein "a Russian asset -- I mean totally."<br /><br />
Full context: <a href=""></a></p>
— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) <a href="">October 18, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="" charset="utf-8"></script><blockquote>
<p><em><strong>"She's the favorite of the Russians," </strong></em>said Clinton, who also claimed that Gabbard is being set up to run third party. "They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far."</p>

<p>The comments didn't sit well with Noah Schachtman, editor-in-chief of <em>The Daily Beast</em>.</p>

<p><strong>"I hope Hillary has solid evidence for this," </strong><a href="">said</a> Shachtman.<em><strong> </strong></em></p>

<p><em><strong>"Otherwise, it's an incredibly fucked up thing for someone of her stature to just blurt out."</strong></em></p>

<p><a href="">According to</a> <em>The Washington Post</em>, Clinton has yet to back up her remarks:</p>

<p>Clinton did not provide any evidence for her claim, though a spokesman later insisted to <em>CNN</em>, "This is not some outlandish claim; this is reality."</p>

<p>Progressives responded to Clinton's conspiracy theories with ridicule.</p>

<p><em><strong>"Hillary's comments about Tulsi just make totally clear how ridiculous the Russia conspiracy crowd has become,"</strong></em> <a href="">said</a> journalist Krystal Ball.</p>

<p><em>Grayzone</em> journalist Aaron Maté <a href="">called</a> Clinton's comments "vile" and centered them in the context of the broader narrative of Democrats smearing opponents as "Russian dupes."</p>

<p><em><strong>"The delusion runs deep," </strong></em>said Maté.</p>

<p>As <em>The Intercept</em>'s Glenn Greenwald <a href="">pointed out</a>, Clinton herself is no stranger to conspiracy theory slurs.</p>

<p>"This is on the level of those who accused Hillary of murdering Vince Foster and running a drug ring out of that Mena runway," said Greenwald.<em><strong> "It's unhinged and shameful—but completely in line with standard Democratic tactics."</strong></em></p>
<span rel="schema:author" class="field field--name-uid field--type-entity-reference field--label-hidden">
<a href="">Tyler Durden</a>
<span property="schema:dateCreated" content="2019-10-19T22:00:00+00:00" class="field field--name-created field--type-created field--label-hidden">Sat, 10/19/2019 - 18:00</span>

<div class="field field--name-field-tags field--type-entity-reference field--label-above">
<div class="field__label">Tags</div>
<div class="field__items">
<div class="field__item"><a href="" property="schema:about" hreflang="en">Politics</a></div>
</div><img src="" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)