Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Snopes & AP Suddenly Quit As Facebook Fact-Checkers
02-02-2019, 12:29 PM,
Snopes & AP Suddenly Quit As Facebook Fact-Checkers
Snopes & AP Suddenly Quit As Facebook Fact-Checkers

<p>Two of Facebook's four fact checkers, Snopes and the Associated Press, have abruptly ended their fact-checking relationship with the social media giant. In a Friday press release, Snopes said that it had "elected not to renew our partnership with Facebook," and while declining to reveal specifics, added that "Forgoing an economic opportunity is not a decision that we or any other journalistic enterprise can take lightly." </p>
<figure role="group" class="caption caption-img"><a data-image-external-href="" data-image-href="" data-link-option="0" href=""><img alt="" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36994720-6a29-4fb7-9c84-25f4dc49999f" data-responsive-image-style="inline_images" height="281" src="" srcset=" 1x" typeof="foaf:Image" width="500" /></a>
<figcaption><em>Snopes co-founders David and Barbara Mikkelson. Barbara is no longer involved in the company following David's infidelity with prostitutes and alleged embezzlement.</em></figcaption></figure><p>While Snopes initially agreed to fact check for free, they eventually accepted $100,000 for its fact-checking services last year. </p>

<p>The announcement comes on the heels of a <a href="">December report</a> that the two-year relationship between Facebook and its fact checkers was in disarray. </p>

<p>Current and former Facebook factcheckers told the Guardian that the tech platform’s collaboration with outside reporters has <strong>produced minimal results</strong> and that they’ve lost trust in Facebook, <strong>which has repeatedly refused to release meaningful data about the impacts of their work</strong>. Some said Facebook’s hiring of a PR firm that used an <a data-link-name="in body link" href="">antisemitic narrative</a> to discredit critics – fueling the same kind of propaganda factcheckers regularly debunk – should be a deal-breaker. -<a href="">The Guardian</a></p>

<p>"They've essentially used us for crisis PR, said former Snopes managing editor Brooke Binkowski. "They’re not taking anything seriously. They are more interested in making themselves look good and passing the buck … <strong>They clearly don’t care.</strong>"</p>
<figure role="group" class="caption caption-img"><a data-image-external-href="" data-image-href="/s3/files/inline-images/binkowski.jpg?itok=rHrrHGhX" data-link-option="0" href=""><img alt="" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="218c1d3b-90c5-4801-a74f-87260b261351" data-responsive-image-style="inline_images" height="300" src="" srcset=" 1x" typeof="foaf:Image" width="500" /></a>
<figcaption><em>Brooke Binkowski, former managing editor of Snopes</em></figcaption></figure><p>Binkowski left Snopes last year and started her own factchecking site, <i><a href=""></a>. </i>She told <em>The Guardian</em> last year that Facebook ignored her concerns about the spread of misinformation in Myanmar during the <a href="">anti-Muslim Rohingya crisis</a> when over 500,000 refugees fled Bangladesh amid persecution. </p>

<p><iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="" width="560"></iframe></p>

<p>"I was bringing up Myanmar over and over and over," said Binkowski. "They were absolutely resistant."</p>

<p><strong>Facebook also pushed its fact checkers to prioritize debunking misinformation that affected its advertisers</strong>, according to Binkowski, something she said crossed a line. "<strong>You’re not doing journalism any more. You’re doing propaganda</strong>," she said - a charge Facebook denied in a <a href="">blogpost</a>. </p>

<p>While Snopes and it's factcheckers grievances are well known, AP gave no explanation for their decision, though they noted in a statement to <em><a href="">TechCrunch</a> </em>that while it was "no longer doing fact checking work for the program, it is not leaving it altogether."</p>

<p>One current Facebook factchecker not authorized to speak publicly <strong>questioned why they're working for the same company that paid a PR firm to promote anti-Semitic fake news about billionaire George Soros</strong>. </p>

<p>"Why should we trust Facebook when it’s pushing the same rumors that its own factcheckers are calling fake news?" said the factchecker. "It’s worth asking how do they treat stories about George Soros on the platform knowing they specifically pay people to try to link political enemies to him?"</p>

<p>"Working with Facebook makes us look bad," added the journalist. </p>

<p>Another factchecker told <em>The Guardian</em> in December that they were demoralized. "<strong>They are a terrible company and, on a personal level, I don’t want to have anything to do with them.</strong>"</p><img src="" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)