Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kavanaugh Accuser Misses 10PM Deadline, Grassley Grants Demand For One More Day
09-22-2018, 03:49 AM,
#1
Kavanaugh Accuser Misses 10PM Deadline, Grassley Grants Demand For One More Day
Kavanaugh Accuser Misses 10PM Deadline, Grassley Grants Demand For One More Day

<p><strong><em>Update: </em>Grassley has granted Ford an additional day to decide on next week's testimony. </strong></p>

<p>In several late Friday tweets, Grassley wrote:</p>

<blockquote>
<p>"Five times now we hv granted extension for Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed w her desire stated one wk ago that she wants to tell senate her story  <strong>Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony</strong>. Come to us or we to u...</p>

<p>... </p>

<p><strong>Judge Kavanaugh I just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed w the statement she made last week to testify to the senate She shld decide so we can move on I want to hear her. I hope u understand. It’s not my normal approach to b indecisive</strong></p>

<p>...</p>

<p>With all the extensions we give Dr Ford to decide if she still wants to testify to the Senate <strong>I feel like I’m playing 2nd trombone in the judiciary orchestra and Schumer is the conductor</strong>"</p>
</blockquote>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">Five times now we hv granted extension for Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed w her desire stated one wk ago that she wants to tell senate her story Dr Ford if u changed ur mind say so so we can move on I want to hear ur testimony. Come to us or we to u</p>
— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1043341000989712384?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">Judge Kavanaugh I just granted another extension to Dr Ford to decide if she wants to proceed w the statement she made last week to testify to the senate She shld decide so we can move on I want to hear her. I hope u understand. It’s not my normal approach to b indecisive</p>
— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1043344767684366336?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">With all the extensions we give Dr Ford to decide if she still wants to testify to the Senate I feel like I’m playing 2nd trombone in the judiciary orchestra and Schumer is the conductor</p>
— ChuckGrassley (@ChuckGrassley) <a href="https://twitter.com/ChuckGrassley/status/1043348132657025025?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><p>After several intense days of negotiations between Congressional GOP and Christine Blasey Ford's legal team this week, the woman who at the 11th hour accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault over 35 years ago missed a 10PM deadline set by Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley. Instead, she has demanded an additional day to make up her mind after her attorney, Debra Katz, called the 10:00 p.m. deadline "arbitrary." </p>

<p><a data-image-external-href="" data-image-href="/sites/default/files/inline-images/grassley%201.jpg?itok=OU85Oc6K" data-link-option="0" href="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/grassley%201.jpg?itok=OU85Oc6K"><img data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="1533df09-2c9c-4922-8bfd-055c3b0d639a" data-responsive-image-style="inline_images" height="281" width="500" srcset="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/grassley%201.jpg?itok=OU85Oc6K 1x" src="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/grassley%201.jpg" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" /></a></p>

<p>Katz made the demand at the end of a strongly worded letter accusing the Judiciary committee of "aggressive and artificial deadlines" which caused "unwarranted anxiety and stress on Dr. Ford." </p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">NEW: Letter from Ford's lawyer to Grassley's staff blasts them for announcing Monday vote, asks her to "be given an additional day to make her decision." <a href="https://t.co/cUAdmgyD6X">pic.twitter.com/cUAdmgyD6X</a></p>
— Sam Stein (@samstein) <a href="https://twitter.com/samstein/status/1043311352557789184?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><p>The ball is now firmly in Grassley's court in what is sure to be a nonstop weekend of rigorous debate over whether the Judiciary Committee Chairman will accede to Ford's latest demand.  </p>

<p>Earlier in the day, Grassley drew a hard line in the sand, allowing Ford's to decide by 10 p.m. whether or not she would appear for testimony next <em>Wednesday</em>, while Ford's team shot back a list of demands, including a <em>Thursday</em> testimony - and that the Committee of "11 old white men" question her instead of outside legal counsel. </p>

<p>Ford's allies are doing their best to demonize Grassley and his committee of "11 old white men" for browbeating an alleged sexual assault victim into a rushed decision.</p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">The recalcitrance, stubbornness and lack of cooperation we’ve seen from Republicans is unprecedented. And candidly, the dismissive treatment of Dr. Ford is insulting to all sexual assault survivors.</p>
— Sen Dianne Feinstein (@SenFeinstein) <a href="https://twitter.com/SenFeinstein/status/1043324014008127488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><p>That said, many on the right have pointed out that Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) waited over 6 weeks to report Ford's allegation to the FBI or any other authorities for investigation. Having employed several former FBI on her staff along with an alleged Chinese spy, Feinstein would have likely known of a number of flagpoles to fly Ford's accusation up to begin the investigative process. </p>

<p><a data-image-external-href="" data-image-href="/sites/default/files/inline-images/schumer%20feinstein.jpg?itok=tAclbwDd" data-link-option="0" href="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/schumer%20feinstein.jpg?itok=tAclbwDd"><img data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d876aab6-0661-498d-871e-8f358e1bf6d4" data-responsive-image-style="inline_images" height="363" width="500" srcset="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/styles/inline_image_desktop/public/inline-images/schumer%20feinstein.jpg?itok=tAclbwDd 1x" src="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/schumer%20feinstein.jpg" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" /></a></p>

<p>Congressional GOP agreed to skip the outside lawyer. </p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">.<a href="https://twitter.com/nancycordes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@nancycordes</a>: "In a very unusual move, GOP senators are seeking to cede their right to question [Christine Blasey] Ford at the hearing to an outside lawyer. That could be because there are 11 Republicans on the cmte & all of them are men. They may be concerned about the optics." <a href="https://t.co/y3tGecASOS">pic.twitter.com/y3tGecASOS</a></p>
— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/CBSEveningNews/status/1043310195441631232?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<p>Perhaps another factor bolstering GOP steadfastness on the issue is the Friday revalation that Ford's current political adviser - former Obama and Clinton White House official Ricky Seidman, <strong>had allegedly been </strong><em><strong><a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-21/kavanaugh-accusation-orchestrated-hit-involving-fmr-anita-hill-adviser-new-audio">working on Ford's situation since July</a></strong> - </em>outlining a plan on a newly released audio tape to use the allegation as political fodder to derail Kavanaugh's confirmation, and if unsuccessful, at least <strong>politically</strong> <strong>harm Republicans during midterms</strong>. </p>

<p>One might think that Ford, an ostensibly intelligent PhD, would have considered the likelihood of her eventual Congressional testimony the moment she decided to involve California legislators in her claims prior to the 11th hour of Kavanaugh's confirmation. </p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">We are t believe? Ford has waited 36 years to confront her abuser yet she is finding any excuse to avoid it.</p>
— Bradley Blakeman (@BlakemanB) <a href="https://twitter.com/BlakemanB/status/1043315681817546757?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">Dr Ford is a little busy dealing with the death threats on her and her family to give the old white republican men exactly the time line they’d like with regard to her testimony. But they just don’t care.</p>
— steven pasquale (@StevePasquale) <a href="https://twitter.com/StevePasquale/status/1043318714433785856?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><p><b>Was Ford's account leaked?</b></p>

<p>Meanwhile, per the <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/kavanaugh-ally-says-he-did-not-communicate-with-white-house-or-supreme-court-nominee-about-theory-of-another-attacker/2018/09/21/88335f1a-bdaa-11e8-b7d2-0773aa1e33da_story.html?utm_term=.5f3ebab05720"><em>Washington Post</em></a>, Ford now claims that Ed Whelan - a former Scalia clerk who posited a controversial theory that Ford may have mistaken Kavanaugh for a <a href="https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-09-20/was-kavanaugh-accuser-almost-raped-his-doppelganger-new-theory-emerges">high school Doppelgänger</a>, was creeping her Linkedin page before her accusation became public knowledge - suggesting that someone leaked her name to him. The White House denied the suggestion on Friday, stating that "neither Kavanaugh nor anyone in the White House gave Ford's name to Whelan before it was disclosed by the <em>Post</em>." </p>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en">
<p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en" xml:lang="en">Who leaked Christine Ford’s name to Ed Whelan? This earlier account from <a href="https://twitter.com/washingtonpost?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@washingtonpost</a> raises questions if it was a Senate Judiciary staffer, an FBI agent or possibly a sitting US Senator, likely one from the GOP. <a href="https://t.co/ofhq9oBp1V">https://t.co/ofhq9oBp1V</a> <a href="https://t.co/pS9LuCtNZI">pic.twitter.com/pS9LuCtNZI</a></p>
— Stuart Leavenworth (@sleavenworth) <a href="https://twitter.com/sleavenworth/status/1043316303484919808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 22, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><p>And here we are, buckle up for a long weekend... </p>
<script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><script async="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/zerohedge/feed/~4/knIhuhiTKi8" height="1" width="1" alt=""/>


http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/zerohedge...urt-monday
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)